Narrow down your iSCSI SAN options


Narrow down your iSCSI SAN options

What you will learn from this tip: The iSCSI SAN market is hot. This tip outlines recent developments and key players so you'll know what's up with iSCSI right now.

The number and variety of iSCSI SAN

Continue Reading This Article

Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.

By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.

You also agree that your personal information may be transferred and processed in the United States, and that you have read and agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

Safe Harbor

options is growing by leaps and bounds. In the first few months of 2006, there were significant iSCSI announcements from Hewlett-Packard, Brocade and, most notably, Microsoft. Furthermore, server virtualization superstar VMware stands to jolt the market for iSCSI arrays, when the iSCSI-friendly ESX Server 3 comes out of beta.

Hewlett-Packard's latest foray into the iSCSI market comes via its midrange modular EVA SAN arrays, which can now be outfitted with an iSCSI Connectivity Option. With it, EVA users can gain concurrent access to the array via either Fibre Channel (FC) or iSCSI, or can use the entire EVA exclusively as an iSCSI target. The option is available for new and existing EVA arrays.

Brocade's iSCSI offering is called the Brocade iSCSI Gateway, or BIG, which consists of two Gigabit Ethernet ports and two FC ports. Based on technology from Sanrad, BIG could theoretically be used to connect up to 100 hosts to an existing SAN array.

Of interest to smaller shops, Microsoft will begin offering an iSCSI target as part of its Windows Storage Server (WSS) 2003 R2 release in the summer of 2006. Thus far, Microsoft has limited its iSCSI wares to a software initiator -- the driver that allows a host to connect to an iSCSI array. The addition of iSCSI target software promises an end-to-end, all-Microsoft block storage environment.

Microsoft's iSCSI target code comes by way of its acquisition of the technology assets of String Bean Software. The product, WinTarget, was developed exclusively for Windows, and includes Virtual Disk Services (VDS) and Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) support.

The iSCSI target option won't be available to end users, only to WSS R2 licensees, including big names like Dell, Hewlett-Packard and IBM. "The only ones you won't see are EMC and Network Appliance," says Claude Lorensen, Microsoft's group product manager for storage. He expects most WSS licensees to adopt the iSCSI target add-on.

Does Microsoft's entrance into the iSCSI marketplace mean impending doom for the handful of iSCSI array vendors that have carved out a market for themselves? John Joseph, VP of marketing at EqualLogic, doesn't think so. When he looks at WinTarget, he says, "I don't see the layers of intelligence that EqualLogic brings to the table," like automated load balancing, space-efficient snapshots and clustering support. In his mind, Microsoft's WinTarget will be applicable for shops with a maximum of 10 servers and no pressing scalability needs.

Indeed, some iSCSI shops, like Poe Financial Group, an insurance company in Tampa, Fla., are pushing the envelope of how far modern IT will go. Using a combination of VMware server virtualization, NSI Software's Double-Take replication and an iSCSI SAN from LeftHand Networks, Eric Tuley, Poe's senior systems engineer, boasts that from the time of a declared disaster, he can get his environment up and running in about an hour. "I challenge any bigger shops to be able to say that," he says.

With his eye on using VMware's VMotion to perform maintenance on virtual machines, Tuley is beta testing ESX Server 3, which comes with a native iSCSI initiator as part of the kernel. With previous versions of ESX Server, if you wanted to use iSCSI, you had to install initiators within the virtual machine, "and it just wasn't stable," says Tuley. So far, the iSCSI component has been working flawlessly, he reports.

"Actually, we're seeing 90% of the performance of ESX Server to our FC SAN; that surprised us," he says.

Do you know:

How to compare FC and SCSI?

This was first published in April 2006

Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.