Home > Data Storage Tips > Data storage management > Records retention: How to avoid recovery headaches
Storage UK Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

DATA STORAGE MANAGEMENT

Records retention: How to avoid recovery headaches


Rick Cook
09.21.2006
Rating: --- (out of 5)


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


What you will learn from this tip: Traditional backups are rarely adequate for records retention, but many are still relying on them. Rick Cook outlines four things to consider when setting up a records retention policy that can save you a lot of trouble in the long run.

While everyone has heard of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), and most people have heard of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), there are many other laws and regulations governing retention of electronic records that are less familiar, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 17a-4.

((Content component not found.)) There can be other issues besides retaining records. For example, SEC Rule 206(4)-7 requires that investment advisors have business continuity plans in place to continue operations in the event of a disaster -- including disaster recovery plans for IT.

Not all of these rules apply to all enterprises, nor to everyone within an enterprise, but they all have one thing in common: Not having the required documents when the lawyers or regulators come calling can be an expensive, embarrassing nightmare.

Don't assume backups can do the job
Traditionally, companies have relied on backups for record retention. But backups are for recovery from a crash or accidental deletion, not for records management. Sometimes your regular backups will be adequate for the additional job, but in a lot of cases they aren't.

Trying to recover certain records for legal or compliance purposes from conventional backups can be anything from time consuming to a nightmare. This is especially true if only a few records are needed out of thousands or tens of thousands already backed up. Emails are the classic example. The entire backup may have to be examined to produce relatively few documents. Since several years worth of records often have to be combed, this is a major task. According to the Securities Industry Association (SIA), one large broker estimated the cost of going through three years of email backups to produce specific messages for the SEC to be between $250,000 and $350,000.

Don't try to do it yourself
Deciding which records to keep is not an IT function. It's a legal, compliance and accounting function. That means that all the appropriate groups need to be involved in deciding which material to preserve and how to preserve it.

Ideally, top management should set up a committee representing all the involved departments to work out a corporate records retention policy. IT needs to be represented, but it probably shouldn't take the lead in formulating the policy.

Whether you have a formal committee or not, the first step is to get an inventory of which regulations apply to which departments in your company. From that domain, experts (lawyers, accountants, etc.) can develop lists of what kinds of records, such as emails, instant messages, etc., need to be preserved and for how long.

Keep in mind that from a legal standpoint, retaining too much, too long is almost as bad as not keeping enough. Your policy should specify appropriate "sunset" times for electronic records and the procedure for destroying them.

The policy should also consider critical issues, such as how quickly copies of the records will be produced and the resources required to implement the policy.

Consider how you'll get it back
When records are needed because of a legal or compliance issue, they are often needed quickly. The company may be under subpoena to produce them within a specified time, and legal and other departments will need time to review them.

You need a process that can recover the records cost effectively within the policy's time frame. This may involve additional software or even an entire parallel archiving system, depending on the volume and needs.

Pay close attention to email
From an IT standpoint, email is one of the thorniest problems in records retention. Laws, like SOX, require that specific kinds of emails from corporate officers and certain other employees be retained.

Email and instant messages are a problem because of the combination of volume and the inflexibility of backups. A number of companies, such as Sherpa Software (www.sherpasoftware.com) and Open Text (www.opentext.com), offer document management software that handles email.

Do you know…

How to choose an email archiving strategy?

About the author: Rick Cook has been writing about mass storage since the days when the term meant an 80 K floppy disk. The computers he learned on used ferrite cores and magnetic drums. For the last 20 years, he has been a freelance writer specializing in storage and other computer issues.


Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchStorage.co.UK.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


RELATED CONTENT
Data storage management
Server virtualisation may have big disaster recovery payoff
How to mitigate the performance penalties of data encryption software
Avoiding storage-related bottlenecks in virtualized environments
How to resolve storage issues in virtualized server environments
How to choose an e-discovery tool
Ten reasons storage security is critical
How to reduce risk with storage security policies
How to increase your storage energy efficiency
Why you should perform data classification
What to expect from a storage audit

Email archiving and compliance initiatives
Mimosa NearPoint module automates email retention, data classification
Compliance FAQ Guide
Blade storage vendor rolls out object-based clustered storage
Taxi firm hails email archiving savings from Mimosa NearPoint
Kazeon tool permits e-discovery at remote sites
Content-addressed storage (CAS) explained
Kazeon boosts data classification with e-discovery features
Clearwell makes its e-discovery search more transparent
Compliance, storage environments and Humpty Dumpty
ILM diary: Time to select the file archiving supplier

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
Data Protection Act 1998  (SearchStorageUK.com)
Freedom of Information Act 2000  (SearchStorageUK.com)
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)  (SearchStorageUK.com)
MiFID  (SearchStorageUK.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their organizations' IT projects - with its network of technology-specific Web sites, events and magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2008 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts