|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Home > Data Storage News > Selling BC/DR to management | |
| Data Storage News: |
|
||
Guidelines: Business Impact Analysis: First, it is crucial to conduct a Business Impact Analysis exercise. This identifies what the enterprise has at risk and which business applications and processes are most critical. The direct and indirect impact of business interruptions is assessed over time, resulting in requirements for recovery time and recovery point objectives. Total cost of downtime: Work with your business stakeholders, legal and financial departments to document the total losses per day that your organisation would face if you were not capable of quick and timely application recovery. Keep in mind that disaster recovery and business continuance are nothing more than risk avoidance. Senior managers will have a clearer understanding when you can demonstrate how much risk they will be taking. The following points should be considered in order to know your downtime costs per hour and per day.
Classify IT applications/data as per their respective criticality and importance from a business point of view. Set appropriate recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives for all applications, aligned with recovery requirements finalised with business stakeholders. Total Cost of high risk without DR/BC: Without proper BC/DR the risks of recovery from a disaster are very high and insurance costs are generally very high as compared to environments with BC/DR in place. The probability of disaster striking a business has grown in the last decade due to climate change (storms, floods, earthquakes) terror threats, power failures (e.g. North America power grid failures), hacker attacks on business intranets/websites and virus risks. A detailed recovery plan should cover the following points: Generally, following the below formula is a good indicator of investment impact for a BC/DR solution. Impact of Investments = Total Cost of Disaster – [(Investments Required for BC/DR) – (Return/Benefits of Investments on BC/DR)] A positive value for the Impact of Investment factor shows that the total return on investments on BC/DR is more that total cost of implementing a BC/DR solution. Where as negative value indicates that BC/DR investment doesn't make business sense for that particular organisation. In conclusion, in my experience the total cost of loss due to a disaster and its related risks (in an enterprise business environment) are significantly more than the total cost of implementing a well planned and prepared BC/DR solution. Once business executives and senior management realise the importance of having proper BC and DR plans, it is easier to extract funding for future projects. The foundation of BC/DR success will come from senior management sponsorship and participation in addition to building BC into enterprise culture by weaving processes into the life cycle of every project and change management process.
About the author: Bilal Mehdi is a senior consultant at Glasshouse Technologies (UK), a global provider of IT infrastructure services, with over 9 years experience in large systems, Storage and Database solution design. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| About Us | Contact Us | For Advertisers | For Business Partners | Site Index | RSS |
|
|
|
|||||||