Seagate Technology has filed suit against EMC solid-state disk drive (SSD) partner Stec, alleging the company's SSDs infringe Seagate's patents.
Seagate filed the lawsuit in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, claiming Stec violated four patents Seagate registered between 2002 and 2006. Seagate is seeking an injunction and damages.
Stec counters that Seagate is bringing this lawsuit because STEC is eating into its market share as SSDs grow more popular, a perspective bolstered by recent public comments from Seagate's CEO.
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more.
However, in an interview in March with Fortune magazine, Seagate CEO Bill Watkins said he was convinced flash drive makers, such as Samsung and Intel, were violating Seagate's SSD intellectual property, raising the possibility of lawsuits if flash drives started becoming more affordable.
Flash memory prices dropped in the last quarter, so much so that in March Intel cut back its first-quarter gross margin forecast because of lower-than-expected prices for chips. Intel then declared it was entering the SSD market.
"Given the effect SSDs are having on the HDD market, Stec believes that Seagate's lawsuit is completely without merit and primarily motivated by competitive concerns, rather than a desire to protect its intellectual property," Stec said in a statement about the lawsuit. "Stec believes that Seagate's action is a desperate move to disrupt how aggressively customers are embracing Stec's Zeus-IOPS technology and changing the balance of power in enterprise storage."
In an open letter on Seagate's website, Watkins claimed, "This is not about stifling innovation or threats to our business from solid-state technology." Instead, he wrote, "It would be our preference to avoid costly and distracting lawsuits and to instead pursue constructive commercial partnerships and licensing agreements with others in our industry… However, until the underlying infringement is stopped, it is necessary for us to take all of the required steps, including legal action."
IDC analyst Dave Reinsel said the lawsuit shows that SSDs are for real as an enterprise play. "I can't say who's wrong or who's right in this case, but one thing this does do is validate that SSDs are no longer a niche, and their growth is not just hype," he said.
So why would Seagate go after Stec only? Reinsel said there may be other reasons as well, but, "Stec is the one supplying EMC for top tier storage, and they're the first one to really have a viable, reliable solid-state solution adopted by a major storage OEM, which is Seagate's bread and butter."
"This lawsuit could also go away if there's an acquisition or a merger - we can really only surmise what Seagate's motivation is," Reinsel added.
Any acquisition talks after this point "would be awkward," according to Patrick Wilkison, Stec vice president of marketing and business development. However, he did say singling Stec out, "might be a tactical move to force us into some type of collaboration venture, since they're having trouble bringing their own product to market."