Home > Ask the Data Storage Experts > Questions & Answers > HBAs: Are dual HBAs worth the investment?
Ask The Storage UK Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

HBAs: Are dual HBAs worth the investment?

Greg Schulz EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Greg Schulz

Pose a Question
Other Storage UK Categories
Meet all Storage UK Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 14 June 2006
We have a 150 server dual-fabric storage area network (SAN) currently in place. That will grow to 350+ servers before year-end. We have 10 terabytes (TB) of HDS arrays, soon to be 20 TB, going through two Cisco directors. Some of our servers have dual HBAs, but many do not. Management is balking at spending the extra funds to go with dual HBAs for all servers, basically saying to live with single HBAs for the time being. What are the pros and cons of this approach, as you see it? We can already see concerns with regard to things like future microcode upgrades, cache upgrades, unplanned outages, etc. What would you recommend (if money were no object)? Thanks in advance.

>
EXPERT RESPONSE
A question for your management is what value they place on a specific application or server's availability and uptime. If a particular application or server can be offline and unavailable for some period of time for planned and unplanned outages, then a single HBA might be applicable. On the other hand, if the value of application availability exceeds the costs of an HBA; you need to work with your management so they will understand that the price of an HBA can be less than the cost for downtime. When possible, look for ways to build in redundancy including dual HBAs or network NICs unless there is no business reason or benefit to do so. It is important to consider the potential consequences to your customers and applications users.

Without knowing more details about your particular environment, applications, performance, physical layout, network and availability requirements, I hesitate to make any specific recommendation. However, generally speaking, I would look to see if some level of server consolidation using server virtualization is appropriate to reduce the number of physical servers, and thus, the number of HBAs and associated SAN ports. However, this would be dependent on the application's performance requirements as well as application and business needs for dedicated servers. With server consolidation comes the risk of putting too many eggs (or applications) in a basket (server), so be mindful of high availability and server failover capabilities.

What you may find is that some servers could be consolidated onto a larger, higher performance server with redundant 2 gigabit (Gb) or 4 Gb Fibre Channel (FC) adapters to reduce the total number of servers, and thus, adapters. Another consideration to explore is attaching some of the servers using iSCSI to access FC storage via your Cisco directors or third-party iSCSI-to-FC bridge/gateway/router eliminating the need for FC HBAs on your servers. Of course, you would need to have available Ethernet ports or add additional NICs to your servers if needed, thus there would be a cost tradeoff to consider.

Do you know…

When to use a switch?


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


RELATED CONTENT
Fibre Channel (FC) SAN
Ethernet juggernaut will be hard to beat for network virtualisation
Council opts for tiered Compellent SAN to cut staff and power costs
IBM set to launch block-level XIV Storage System
FCoE no threat to iSCSI SAN makers, says LeftHand exec
Bullish Cisco predicts Fibre Channel over Ethernet storage arrays in 2009
Comic Relief chooses Compellent SAN for tiering, provisioning features
Brocade waves caution flag for Fibre Channel over Ethernet
Council sticks with IBM for £150,000 SAN project
Free Sun utility turns OpenSolaris servers into Fibre Channel storage arrays
Nexsan disk array combines SAS with MAID

SAN management
Core Blimey – Do we still need edge switches?
Council opts for tiered Compellent SAN to cut staff and power costs
More SAN capacity is not always better
Systems administrators make the best SAN administrators
The bigger the SAN, the greater the risk it will crumble
IBM rolls out thin provisioning on SVC storage virtualisation devices
Xiotech Virtual View automates storage provisioning for VMware
HDS streamlines storage management tools
How to size a SAN
UK storage startup boosts US market presence

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
Browse our Expert Advice

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their organizations' IT projects - with its network of technology-specific Web sites, events and magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Reprints  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2008, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts